The foundation of stable governments hinges on a simple but powerful promise: opportunity. When people believe that their hard work will lead to progress and a better life, they remain committed to the system. But when that promise is broken, entire regimes can collapse.
Artificial intelligence is not merely transforming jobs—it is fundamentally unraveling the social contract that underpins national stability. The displacement caused by AI isn’t just about rising unemployment; it’s creating a uniquely dangerous group: well-educated, skilled individuals who suddenly find themselves with nothing to lose and potentially everything to fight for.
Imagine the impact as AI systematically eradicates middle-class jobs across many professions—something we are witnessing today. For example, lawyers replaced by sophisticated legal algorithms don’t just lose their income; they lose their social standing, sense of purpose, and the trust they once had in the institutions they supported. Doctors sidelined by diagnostic AI face the painful reality of machines outperforming them at the very work they dedicated their lives to. Teachers, accountants, engineers, analysts—all watch as their specialized knowledge is diminished in a blink.
These displaced professionals are far from powerless victims. In fact, they represent one of the most formidable groups any government can create: educated dissenters equipped with the know-how to organize and challenge the status quo.
History repeatedly shows that governments don’t usually collapse under the pressure of popular uprisings from the poorest classes. Instead, it is the middle class, when locked out of opportunity and power, that often triggers revolution. Every major successful upheaval has been driven by disaffected professionals who knew how power operated and had the skills to seize it.
Consider the French Revolution. It wasn’t the starving peasants who sparked it, but ambitious lawyers, merchants, and intellectuals frustrated by aristocratic exclusion. Their drive stemmed less from hunger and more from rage at being blocked from advancement. Leaders like Maximilien Robespierre and Georges Danton were legal professionals who could clearly see the heights of power but were denied access. Their frustration was so intense that they dismantled the old system entirely.
The Russian Revolution followed a similar trajectory. Lenin wasn’t a laborer but a lawyer from a middle-class background. His radicalization emerged not from material deprivation alone, but from systemic powerlessness. The Bolshevik movement was made up of educated individuals—journalists, students, and professionals—who watched the elite hoard opportunities as their own chances shrank. They possessed both the vision to imagine a new order and the practical ability to impose it. Stalin, too, transformed personal frustration into a brutal campaign to overthrow the old regime, illustrating how blocked ambitions can escalate into violent shifts.
Even Adolf Hitler's rise to power reinforces this pattern. The Nazis’ main base was not in the poorest neighborhoods but among the embittered middle class—small business owners, clerks, and shopkeepers devastated by hyperinflation that wiped away their savings while the wealthy remained untouched. Their loss of stability bred resentful anger. Crucially, they also had the organizational talent, social networks, and discipline to build a movement that dismantled the democratic Weimar Republic and installed a dictatorial regime.
This pattern repeats because the middle class inhabits society’s most precarious zone. The working poor are accustomed to hardship and less prone to revolt. The rich have little incentive to rebel since the system benefits them. But the middle class has tasted comfort, achieved education, and learned how power functions—only to find the doors to advancement slammed shut.
The AI revolution is accelerating this precarious dynamic at a pace and scale unlike any before. While the Industrial Revolution eventually generated new middle-class roles, AI threatens to entrench a rigid two-tier society: those who control the algorithms and everyone else.
The political stakes are enormous. When millions of educated professionals suddenly lose their place in society, governments face a profound existential crisis. These individuals are not easily pacified or manipulated; their frustrations cut across traditional political lines. A conservative small business owner displaced by automation shares more in common with a liberal academic replaced by AI teaching tools than they do with the ultra-wealthy tech elite responsible for their displacement. Political divisions blur when the middle class risks extinction.
When the educated middle class loses faith in gradual reforms, they don’t just call for change—they become the architects of revolution. If merit and expertise no longer matter, why respect laws crafted by politicians who failed to manage AI’s disruption? Why uphold an economy that enriches tech billionaires while the majority sink deeper into insecurity?
When talent hits invisible silicon ceilings, when ambition is blocked by algorithmic gatekeepers, belief in the current system erodes. Once the middle class abandons hope in slow change, they stop obeying old rules and start creating new ones.
No previous government has encountered a threat like this. Without the stabilizing middle class, societies don't just stall—they tip toward upheaval.
The critical question is no longer if AI will topple governments, but rather how many will fall and how quickly.
John Mac Ghlionn is a writer and researcher focused on the intersections of culture, society, and technology’s impact on everyday life.
© 2025 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction, broadcasting, or redistribution of this material is prohibited.
